eco global survival game common sense media

Although better environmental protection was achievable at far less cost, “it is unlikely that calls for more research or cost-benefit analysis would have captured the attention of the nation’s policy makers,” observe the authors.

During the 1960s and 1970s the environmental movement was able to generate substantial political support for what was in truth a radical regulatory agenda. As the authors of Eco-Sanity observe: “Though the language of Silent Spring has more in common with Night of the Living Dead and Frankenstein than it does with a scientific treatise, the book was presented to the public as objective science.” Unfortunately, Carson’s apocalyptic fear-mongering has been widely imitated by the likes of Lester Brown, Paul Ehrlich, and many others over the years.Įco-Sanity comes at a propitious moment. Carson was completely wrong in her warning that chemicals were going to create a “silent spring,” but that didn’t matter to many readers.

It was another book, Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring, that helped create the modern environmental movement three decades ago. Written by a trio of free market analysts and outdoorsmen, Eco-Sanity should provide the standard against which future environmentalist claims are measured.

But if you want the one book that concisely explains both the real ecological state of the world and offers sensible, market-oriented solutions to environmental problems, it is Eco-Sanity: A Common-Sense Guide to Environmentalism. Thoughtful environmentalists like Wallace Kaufman and Martin Lewis have written sharp critiques of the dishonesty and radicalism of movement activists. Ronald Bailey, Michael Fumento, Lou Guzzo, and Dixy Lee Ray, among others, have produced devastating studies of environmental foolishness. Many good books have appeared on the environment and the environmental movement in recent years.

Eco global survival game common sense media